Movie Review: The Women
By Priscilla Beth Baker
September 30, 2008
Running time 114 minutes
Written and directed by Diane English
Starring: Meg Ryan, Annette Bening, Eva
Mendes, Debra Messing, Jada Pinkett Smith
It's difficult to imagine a
film that can make even Annette Bening look bad, but The Women is that film.
Writer and director Diane English sought to re-make George Cukor's 1939
classic of the same name.
Having not seen the original, I can only speak to the tedious, dull
disaster that is the second one.
Meet Mary Haines (Meg Ryan),
a talented fashion designer who has settled for working for her father's
company making sketches instead of following her own dreams, but seems quite
happy to do it until her father fires her. Things change too when Saks
manicurist (Debi Mazar) gossips to Mary's best friend Sylvie (Annette Bening)
about Mary's husband Steven and his affair with perfume spritzer-girl Crystal (Eva
Mendes).
Thus is the trajectory of
our heroine: successful man dumps
beautiful wife for younger beautiful woman; woman's life falls apart (and we
know this because she won't get out of her pajamas and she eats a stick of
butter dumped in cocoa powder and milk); woman gets life back together (with
new fashion business and better hair); man wants newly successful wife back;
newly successful wife considers his proposal but asserts her needs this time around.
How many times have we seen
this story? I can't count that
high. But I can tell you that this
is very possibly one of the worst
versions of this story I have ever seen.
Aside from Sylvie, Mary also
has two other pals to lean on in this trying time: lesbian writer Alex (Jada
Pinkett Smith) and the eternally pregnant Edie (Debra Messing).
Neither of these actresses
receives any screen time worth mentioning and their talents are completely
wasted.
From the first moment of the
film, the dialogue feels painfully forced, almost as if the actresses are reading
from sideline cue cards because they haven't quite memorized their lines
yet. I had to keep reminding
myself what a talented cast English had assembled and the only reason I could
come up with that even these actresses couldn't deliver their lines with
any sense of commitment or believability, is that the script was, frankly, a
ridiculously trite mess and there was no way to prevent the inevitable
disaster.
There is not one believable
female relationship in this film.
You know they are trying
really hard to manufacture these bonds, because that's what all good actresses
do, but all the audience gets is a string of pointless monologues full of
overbearing sentiments.
English seems to be using
each of these actresses as a vehicle to deliver every feminine cliché that
exists, strung together in awkward and totally inappropriate moments.
Interestingly, there is not
one male character present in this film (unless you count Debra Messing's
much-sought-after-too-many-girls-baby boy who is delivered in the corny
climactic final 15 minutes). The
elusive Mr. Haines is only spoken of (not kindly), Sylvie has no time for a man
with her lucrative fashion magazine editor career, Edie is apparently raising
these multitudes of children alone and Alex--well, she's a lesbian for good
reason. I found this lack of a male presence especially ironic because men are
all these women talk about!
The absence of men, I'm
sure, was intentional, so that English could focus on the poignant and
meaningful nature of female friendships.
But rather than illustrate that point, it insults it, reducing these
potentially vibrant women to nothing but a farce, and not even a funny one at
that.


Comments (1)
So, let me make sure I'm clear on this--you DIDN'T like this film? HA! Thank you thank you thank you for a clear, pointed, straightforward review that doesn't waste time on finding an obligatory silver lining. If only all reviewers were this frank.
vicki | October 1, 2008 1:42 PMPost a comment